Sakrokoksigeal pilonidal sinüsün cerrahi tedavisinde Karydakis flep ameliyatı ile primer kapamanın karşılaştırılması
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2008
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Amaç: Bu prospektif çalışmada, pilonidal sinüsün cerrahi tedavisi için son dönemlerde yaygın kullanılan bir teknik olan Karydakis flep ameliyatı ile primer kapama tekniği karşılaştırıldı. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Pilonidal sinüs nedeniyle ameliyat edilen 48 hasta (46 erkek, 2 kadın) çalışmaya alındı. Hastalar iki gruba ayrıldı. Sinüs eksizyonundan sonra 33 hastaya (grup 1) primer kapama, 15 hastaya (grup 2) ise Karydakis flep ameliyatı uygulandı. Ortalama takip süresi grup 1'de 6.8 ay (dağılım 4-11 ay), grup 2'de 6.2 ay (dağılım 3-10 ay) idi. Bulgular: Grup 1'de dört hastada (%12.1), grup 2'de iki hastada (%13.3) yara yerinde seröz sıvı birikimi ve akıntı saptandı. Grup 2'de bir hastada (%6.7) yara yerinde ciltaltı hematom oluştu. Takipler sırasında her iki grupta da hiçbir hastada yara yerinde enfeksiyon görülmezken, grup 1'de bir (%3), grup 2'de yine bir hastada (%6.7) erken dönemde nüks görüldü. Sonuç: Uygulanması diğer yöntemlere göre daha kolay ve basit, iyileşme süresi daha kısa ve skar dokusu daha az olduğundan, eksizyon ve primer kapama yöntemi uygun olgularda tercih edilen bir ameliyat şekli olabilir.
Objectives: In this prospective study, we compared primary closure and Karydakis flap repair which has recently proved a popular technique for surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus. Patients and Methods: The study included 48 patients (46 males, 2 females) who were operated on for pilonidal sinus. The patients were randomized to two groups. After sinus excision, 33 patients (group 1) underwent primary closure, and 15 patients (group 2) underwent Karydakis flap surgery. The mean followup was 6.8 months (range 4 to 11 months) in group 1, and 6.2 months (range 3 to 10 months) in group 2. Results: Serous liquid collection and discharge were seen at the site of the lesion in four patients (12.1%) in group 1, and in two patients (13.3%) in group 2. Subcutaneous hematoma was detected in one patient (6.7%) in group 2. During the follow-up period, none of the patients developed wound infection. Recurrences were seen in one patient (3%) in group 1, and in one patient (6.7%) in group 2. Conclusion: Excision and primary closure can be the preferred method for the treatment of pilonidal sinus in selected patients due to its advantages such as ease and simplicity, shorter recovery time, and limited scar formation.
Objectives: In this prospective study, we compared primary closure and Karydakis flap repair which has recently proved a popular technique for surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus. Patients and Methods: The study included 48 patients (46 males, 2 females) who were operated on for pilonidal sinus. The patients were randomized to two groups. After sinus excision, 33 patients (group 1) underwent primary closure, and 15 patients (group 2) underwent Karydakis flap surgery. The mean followup was 6.8 months (range 4 to 11 months) in group 1, and 6.2 months (range 3 to 10 months) in group 2. Results: Serous liquid collection and discharge were seen at the site of the lesion in four patients (12.1%) in group 1, and in two patients (13.3%) in group 2. Subcutaneous hematoma was detected in one patient (6.7%) in group 2. During the follow-up period, none of the patients developed wound infection. Recurrences were seen in one patient (3%) in group 1, and in one patient (6.7%) in group 2. Conclusion: Excision and primary closure can be the preferred method for the treatment of pilonidal sinus in selected patients due to its advantages such as ease and simplicity, shorter recovery time, and limited scar formation.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Anestezi, Tıbbi Araştırmalar Deneysel, Göz Hastalıkları, Ortopedi, Cerrahi
Kaynak
Trakya Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
25
Sayı
2
