Long-term Results of One Cycle of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Applied Before Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYılmaztepe, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorTaylan, Gökay
dc.contributor.authorUçar, Fatih Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Uğur
dc.contributor.authorAktoz, Meryem
dc.contributor.authorGürlertop, Hanefi Yekta
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:13:23Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:13:23Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Myocardial injury after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is seen frequently. Ischemia/reperfusion injury, side branch occlusion and distal embolization of atherothrombotic debris are the maincauses of myocardial injury. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a promising technique for protectionfrom ischemia/reperfusion injury, but sufficient data of long-term clinical outcomes is not available. In thisstudy we planned to investigate the effect of one cycle of RIPC on major cardiovascular events one year afterelective PCI.Patients and Methods: 102 patients, undergoing elective PCI, with normal baseline cTroponin-I (cTn-I)values, were randomized equally into two groups. Five minutes of ischemic preconditioning was appliedbefore the intervention to the preconditioning group, by inflating blood pressure cuff up-to 200 mmHg on nondominantarm. After 1 year, the clinical outcomes of these patients (angina, heart failure, death, myocardialinfarction, repeat revascularization) were questioned.Results: From a total of 102 patients, 90 could be reached after an year. The mean duration of follow-upwas 432 vs. 423.5 days (p= 0.793). Post-PCI 16th hour cTn-I was insignificantly lower in the preconditioningarm (0.079 ?g/L vs. 0.069 ?g/L, p= 0.074). The incidence of cTn-I elevation 5 fold above the URL (> 0.115?g/L) was lower in the preconditioning group; however, it was also insignificant (24.4% vs. 13.3%, p= 0.301).Death, MI or repeat revascularization rates did not differ between the groups.Conclusion: One cycle of RIPC had no effect on major cardiovascular events (MACE) after elective PCI.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage148en_US
dc.identifier.issn2149-2980
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage143en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid329392en_US]
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/329392
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/13970
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKoşuyolu Heart Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleLong-term Results of One Cycle of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Applied Before Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu