The Effect of Mode of Delivery on Newborn Hearing Screening Results

dc.authoridGÜVEN, SELIS GÜLSEVEN/0000-0002-7862-0758
dc.authorwosidGÜVEN, SELIS GÜLSEVEN/AAA-4693-2019
dc.contributor.authorGuven, Selis Gulseven
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:08:40Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:08:40Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Congenital hearing loss is one of the most important public health problems with a frequency of about 1-6 per 1000 live births all over the world. Although neonatal hearing screening tests are important for the timely detection and rehabilitation of hearing loss, determining the factors that may affect the screening results will contribute greatly to the development of screening programs. In this study, the effects of the modes of delivery on the results of tests in the screening program was investigated. Methods: In this study, the results of 10.575 newborns who were screened according to the National Neonatal Hearing Screening Protocol between January 2013 and May 2017 were evaluated. The screening test results of 2.653 newborns were examined retrospectively according to the type of delivery after candidates were excluded according to the exclusion criteria and risk factors for hearing loss. Of these newborns, 1.571 (59.2%) were born by normal deliery and 1.082 (40.8%) by cesarean section. Screening test results were analyzed using Pearson's Chi-square test. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed among the 2.653 neonatal hearing screening test results in terms of mode of delivery (p>0.05). In both delivery modes, the rate of false positive was found to be high (81.9%) in the first hearing screening test of newborns, and this rate decreased in the second screening test (14.5%). Conclusion: The mode of delivery has no significant effect on the neonatal hearing screening results; however, the observation that neonates had been more successful in the second screening test in both groups suggests that the test protocol should be re-evaluated in terms of timing.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/tao.2019.3940
dc.identifier.endpage23en_US
dc.identifier.issn2667-7466
dc.identifier.issn2667-7474
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31049248en_US
dc.identifier.startpage19en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid301443en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/tao.2019.3940
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/301443
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/22511
dc.identifier.volume57en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000463724000005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Yayinciliken_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Archives Of Otorhinolaryngologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMode Of Deliveryen_US
dc.subjectHearingen_US
dc.subjectNeonatal Screeningen_US
dc.subjectOtoacoustic Emissionsen_US
dc.subjectOtoacoustic Emissionsen_US
dc.subjectFailureen_US
dc.subjectBirthen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Mode of Delivery on Newborn Hearing Screening Resultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar