Prioritizing Different Types of Barriers to Knowledge Sharing: A Cause-and-Effect Analysis of the Views of Academics in Turkey

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridBaran Kasapoglu, Esra/0000-0002-2235-5617
dc.authoridAçık, Abdullah/0000-0003-4542-9831
dc.authoridKucukaltan, Berk/0000-0002-2766-3248
dc.authoridAyaz, Ilke Sezin/0000-0002-7053-3940
dc.authorwosidSaatcıoglu, Ömür Yasar/J-8591-2017
dc.authorwosidBaran Kasapoglu, Esra/AAC-2982-2019
dc.authorwosidAçık, Abdullah/W-7349-2019
dc.authorwosidKucukaltan, Berk/R-4151-2019
dc.contributor.authorKasapoglu, Esra Baran
dc.contributor.authorKucukaltan, Berk
dc.contributor.authorAcik, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorAyaz, Ilke Sezin
dc.contributor.authorSaatcioglu, Omur Yasar
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:50:17Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:50:17Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to identify different types of barriers to knowledge sharing among academics in Turkey and to investigate the relationships between the barriers and their degree of impact. Accordingly, it implements qualitative and quantitative approaches in two phases. In the first phase, the knowledge sharing barriers are identified through the literature review and categorized under organizational, individual, and technological dimensions via expert opinions so as to determine current barriers for the Turkish academics. In the second phase, the identified barriers and their interactions are more deeply investigated by using the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory Method (DEMATEL) methods. The findings of the study reveal that organizational and individual knowledge sharing barriers have a stronger effect than technological barriers. According to ISM and DEMATEL findings, corporate structure, power relations, and supportive corporate culture are the driving forces for the knowledge sharing among the academics in Turkey. This study provides a hierarchical and causal relation model that may enable both performing the actions needed to promote academic knowledge sharing and advancing university performances. The findings offer useful insights on what the key barriers are and how these interrelate, so that they can be overcome. Thus, the findings hold significant potential to contribute both to the academic field and to the policymakers who are in charge of taking regulatory actions.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2399/yod.21.805205
dc.identifier.endpage596en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-796X
dc.identifier.issn2146-7978
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage578en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid504553en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.805205
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/504553
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/17950
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000747915300001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTuba-Turkish Acad Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofYuksekogretim Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAcademicsen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge Managementen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge Sharingen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge Sharing Barriersen_US
dc.subjectHigher-Educationen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectCreationen_US
dc.subjectDematelen_US
dc.subjectMotivatorsen_US
dc.subjectLeadershipen_US
dc.subjectAdoptionen_US
dc.subjectSuccessen_US
dc.subjectPredicten_US
dc.titlePrioritizing Different Types of Barriers to Knowledge Sharing: A Cause-and-Effect Analysis of the Views of Academics in Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu