A Retrospective Analysis of Quality Indicators in a Mixed-type Tertiary Center Intensive Care Unit

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridefe, serdar/0000-0002-1229-0602
dc.authoridinal, volkan/0000-0003-2649-104X
dc.authoridEfe, Serdar/0000-0002-1229-0602;
dc.authorwosidefe, serdar/R-8350-2017
dc.authorwosidinal, volkan/A-6069-2018
dc.authorwosidEfe, Serdar/O-9237-2019
dc.authorwosidEfe, Serdar/JAN-4839-2023
dc.contributor.authorEfe, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorSak, Istiklal
dc.contributor.authorInal, Volkan
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:03:54Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:03:54Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed to take a snapshot to assess critical care specific quality indicators and performance of our critical care patients' management course and to have some clues to improve our total quality as the first step of the Total Quality Management course. Material and Methods: The demographic and clinical data of 347 patients admitted to our tertiary center 10-bed mixed-type critical care unit between Jan 1, 2016 and Dec 31, 2016 were retrospectively analyzed at respect of designated quality indicators, herein by Pabon Lasso's Method. Results: The patients' mean age was 65 +/- 16 years, average LOS was 8.9 +/- 16 days, bed turnover rate was 34.7, occupancy rate was 98.3%, mean APACHE II score was 23 +/- 9, and standardized mortality rate was < 1 (0.97). The readmission rate after 48 h of discharge was 2.6%. The post-discharge 90-day mortality rate was 5.1%, post-operative 48th h mortality rate was 2.2%, central venous catheter rate (CVC) was 82%, CVC related blood stream infections were 12.7%, invasive mechanic ventilator (IMV) rate was 71%, IMV-days was 6.5 +/- 3 days, and VAP rate was 12.7%. Conclusion: The common quality indicators are not assumed and are objected to compare the inter-ICUs' differences, on the other hand, could provide useful information about deficient or inefficient points of data to improvable clinics' own performance.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/dcbybd.2018.1685
dc.identifier.endpage6en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-1689
dc.identifier.issn1309-6222
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85056773918en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid307564en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/dcbybd.2018.1685
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/307564
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/21830
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000443336400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherTurkish Soc Medical & Surgical Intensive Care Medicineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Medical And Surgical Intensive Care Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectIntensive Careen_US
dc.subjectQuality Indicatorsen_US
dc.subjectPerformance Evaluationen_US
dc.subjectPabon Lasso's Modelen_US
dc.subjectTotal Quality Managementen_US
dc.subjectRisk-Factorsen_US
dc.subjectReadmissionsen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectOutcomesen_US
dc.titleA Retrospective Analysis of Quality Indicators in a Mixed-type Tertiary Center Intensive Care Uniten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu