The relationship between FDG PET/CT-defined metabolic parameters and the histopathological subtype of oesophageal carcinomas

dc.authoridKorkmaz, Ulku/0000-0002-7155-7610
dc.authoridHacioglu, Bekir/0000-0001-8490-3239
dc.authorwosidKorkmaz, Ulku/AAJ-4430-2020
dc.authorwosidErdogan, Bulent/AAA-9781-2021
dc.authorwosidHacioglu, Bekir/GZH-1824-2022
dc.contributor.authorKorkmaz, Ulku
dc.contributor.authorHacioglu, Muhammet Bekir
dc.contributor.authorKostek, Osman
dc.contributor.authorSut, Necdet
dc.contributor.authorKodaz, Hilmi
dc.contributor.authorErdogan, Bulent
dc.contributor.authorUstun, Funda
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:09:33Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:09:33Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT) scan is accepted as a standard tool in the staging of oesophageal cancer (OC). Histological subtype of tumour is known to be a major determinant of prognosis and metabolic behaviour. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of histological subtypes of OC on standard uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLC) obtained by PET/CT, and also to compare this effect with prognosis. Material and methods: Images and clinical course data of 57 patients who were diagnosed with EC and treated in our hospital between 2009 and 2016 were evaluated in a retrospective manner. PET/CT images were re-analysed in terms of metabolic parameters, and observations were compared with histological subtypes. Results: No significant difference was observed between histological subtypes with SUVmax, overall survival (OS), or progression-free survival (PPS). Thus, MTV was observed to be related with histological subtype; MTV values of adenocancer patients were significantly higher than those of squamous cell cancer patients. Conclusions: Metabolic tumour volume was related with histological subtype of OC, but clinical staging, TLG, and SUVmax values were not related with histological subtype, which may suggest the use of MTV as a routine parameter for OC and inclusion of MTV observations in prognostic scoring.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/pjr.2020.95945
dc.identifier.issn0137-7183
dc.identifier.issn1899-0967
dc.identifier.pmid32612724en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85090653859en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2020.95945
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/22857
dc.identifier.volume85en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000555493300001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInt Scientific Information Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPolish Journal Of Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectOesophageal Canceren_US
dc.subjectPET/CTen_US
dc.subjectSquamous Cell Canceren_US
dc.subjectSuvmaxen_US
dc.subjectMTVen_US
dc.subjectTLGen_US
dc.subjectEmission Tomography/Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectPrognostic Valueen_US
dc.subjectTumor Volumeen_US
dc.subjectStageen_US
dc.titleThe relationship between FDG PET/CT-defined metabolic parameters and the histopathological subtype of oesophageal carcinomasen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar