Effect of surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and evaluation of their microhardness

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridEren, Meltem Mert/0000-0002-5903-6636;
dc.authorwosidEren, Meltem Mert/AAZ-5220-2020
dc.authorwosidDikmen, Benin/IZQ-0164-2023
dc.authorwosidCilingir, Aylin/ACM-9694-2022
dc.contributor.authorGurbuz, Ozge
dc.contributor.authorCilingir, Aylin
dc.contributor.authorDikmen, Benin
dc.contributor.authorOzsoy, Alev
dc.contributor.authorEren, Meltem Mert
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:13:46Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:13:46Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Materials and Methods Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n = 10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. Results No significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. Conclusion Using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/eor.20200020
dc.identifier.endpage8en_US
dc.identifier.issn2630-6158
dc.identifier.issn2651-2823
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32518904en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85124740058en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid347564en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20200020
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/347564
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/23680
dc.identifier.volume54en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000512327100001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIstanbul Univ Press, Istanbul Univ Rectorateen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Oral Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRoughnessen_US
dc.subjectMicrohardnessen_US
dc.subjectResin Compositeen_US
dc.subjectSurface Sealanten_US
dc.subjectMechanical Propertiesen_US
dc.subjectPolishing Proceduresen_US
dc.subjectMechanical-Propertiesen_US
dc.subjectPenetrating Sealanten_US
dc.subjectResin Compositeen_US
dc.subjectPolymerization Shrinkageen_US
dc.subjectConversionen_US
dc.subjectHardnessen_US
dc.subjectSystemsen_US
dc.subjectCureen_US
dc.subjectRestorativesen_US
dc.titleEffect of surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and evaluation of their microhardnessen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu