Bevel Gears Strength Calculation: Comparison ISO, AGMA, DIN, KISSsoft and ANSYS FEM Methods
dc.contributor.author | Irsel, Gurkan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-12T11:13:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-12T11:13:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.department | Trakya Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Gear strength calculation must be done in an appropriate and productive way to develop a strong and compact movement transmissions systems efficiently. In this research, the advantages and disadvantages of the calculation methods and the results of the calculation on a sample application are compared by referencing DIN 3991 method solution. Manual solution is an impractical and error-prone method. A max 27.5 % difference was found between ISO and AGMA analytical results. There is also a 17.3 % difference between KISSsoft solutions of the same methods. The KISSsoft solution gives immediate results in the event of changing different modules and revolutions. Modeling and mesh studies are required in ANSYS solution. Mesh affects the Ansys solution directly. There is 7 % difference between the Ansys FEM and KISSsoft (DIN) solutions. However, ANSYS enables the calculation in non-standard gears and modified gears. In this study, current gear calculation methods are presented, compared and evaluated in detail on an application. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | TUBAP [2019/47]; Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Trakya University (TURKEY) | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This study was supported by the project no. TUBAP 2019/47 which is financially sponsored by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Trakya University (TURKEY). I also would like to thank to Hema Endustri A.S. (Cerkezkoy/Tekirdag Turkey), Irtem Tarim Makineleri San. Tic. Ltd. $ti. (Hayrabolu/Tekirdag/Turkey), Di -San Dili Sanayii (Konya/Turkey) for their contributions and to ONPLUS TEKNOLOJI Hizmetleri A.S. (Bursa/Turkey) for KISS soft software. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 323 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0257-9731 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85112626907 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 315 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/23669 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 43 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000768997200003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Chinese Soc Mechanical Engineers | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal Of The Chinese Society Of Mechanical Engineers | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Root Bending Stress | en_US |
dc.subject | Contact Stress | en_US |
dc.subject | Ansys Finite Element Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Kisssoft | en_US |
dc.subject | DIN 3991:1988 | en_US |
dc.subject | Finite-Element-Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Spur Gears | en_US |
dc.subject | Stress-Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Model | en_US |
dc.subject | Wear | en_US |
dc.title | Bevel Gears Strength Calculation: Comparison ISO, AGMA, DIN, KISSsoft and ANSYS FEM Methods | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |