Bevel Gears Strength Calculation: Comparison ISO, AGMA, DIN, KISSsoft and ANSYS FEM Methods

dc.contributor.authorIrsel, Gurkan
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:13:44Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:13:44Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractGear strength calculation must be done in an appropriate and productive way to develop a strong and compact movement transmissions systems efficiently. In this research, the advantages and disadvantages of the calculation methods and the results of the calculation on a sample application are compared by referencing DIN 3991 method solution. Manual solution is an impractical and error-prone method. A max 27.5 % difference was found between ISO and AGMA analytical results. There is also a 17.3 % difference between KISSsoft solutions of the same methods. The KISSsoft solution gives immediate results in the event of changing different modules and revolutions. Modeling and mesh studies are required in ANSYS solution. Mesh affects the Ansys solution directly. There is 7 % difference between the Ansys FEM and KISSsoft (DIN) solutions. However, ANSYS enables the calculation in non-standard gears and modified gears. In this study, current gear calculation methods are presented, compared and evaluated in detail on an application.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBAP [2019/47]; Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Trakya University (TURKEY)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the project no. TUBAP 2019/47 which is financially sponsored by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Trakya University (TURKEY). I also would like to thank to Hema Endustri A.S. (Cerkezkoy/Tekirdag Turkey), Irtem Tarim Makineleri San. Tic. Ltd. $ti. (Hayrabolu/Tekirdag/Turkey), Di -San Dili Sanayii (Konya/Turkey) for their contributions and to ONPLUS TEKNOLOJI Hizmetleri A.S. (Bursa/Turkey) for KISS soft software.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage323en_US
dc.identifier.issn0257-9731
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85112626907en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage315en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/23669
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000768997200003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherChinese Soc Mechanical Engineersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of The Chinese Society Of Mechanical Engineersen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRoot Bending Stressen_US
dc.subjectContact Stressen_US
dc.subjectAnsys Finite Element Analysisen_US
dc.subjectKisssoften_US
dc.subjectDIN 3991:1988en_US
dc.subjectFinite-Element-Analysisen_US
dc.subjectSpur Gearsen_US
dc.subjectStress-Analysisen_US
dc.subjectModelen_US
dc.subjectWearen_US
dc.titleBevel Gears Strength Calculation: Comparison ISO, AGMA, DIN, KISSsoft and ANSYS FEM Methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar