Volumetric measurements of mandibular incisor root resorption following Forsus FRD EZ2 and Bionator appliance treatment using cone-beam computed tomography: A preliminary study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridMeric, Pamir/0000-0002-4655-5664
dc.authorwosidbilgic zortuk, Fundagul/JVM-8146-2024
dc.authorwosidMeriç, Pamir/AAF-2482-2021
dc.contributor.authorMeric, Pamir
dc.contributor.authorZortuk, Fundagul Bilgic
dc.contributor.authorKaradede, M. Irfan
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:13:44Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:13:44Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Root resorption is one of the frequently encountered problems in orthodontic treatments. The effects of functional appliances on root resorption have not been clearly demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare volumetric root resorption of mandibular incisors after Bionator and Forsus appliance treatment using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: The study sample (n = 30) was selected from Class II div. 1 mandibular retrognathia patients treated with the Bionator and Forsus appliances. The first CBCT scans were taken before Bionator use and after 6 months. In the Forsus group, the first CBCT scans were taken before Forsus appliance use and after an overcorrected Class I relationship was obtained. The mean treatment time with the Forsus appliance was 5 +/- 1.2 months. Mimics software was used for segmentation and volumetric measurements of mandibular incisor teeth root resorption. Results: In the Bionator group, statistically significant root volume loss was not found. In the Forsus group, the differences between before and after the treatment were not statistically significant for teeth 41, 31, and 32 (P > 0.05), whereas the difference was statistically significant for the lower right second incisor (P < 0.002). The percentage of volume loss (%) and root volume loss (mm(3)) was not statistically significant between groups. Conclusions: Following functional treatment with the Bionator and Forsus, statistically significant difference was not found between groups for mandibular incisor root resorption.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.25259/APOS_7_2020
dc.identifier.endpage104en_US
dc.identifier.issn2321-4600
dc.identifier.issn2321-1407
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85118778304en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage96en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.25259/APOS_7_2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/23670
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000553817700006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScientific Scholar Llcen_US
dc.relation.ispartofApos Trends In Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRoot Resorptionen_US
dc.subjectForsusen_US
dc.subjectBionatoren_US
dc.subjectClass IIen_US
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectOrthodontic Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectTooth Movementen_US
dc.subjectPhysical-Propertiesen_US
dc.subjectIntrusionen_US
dc.subjectCementumen_US
dc.subjectAccuracyen_US
dc.subjectSkeletalen_US
dc.subjectForcesen_US
dc.subjectLengthen_US
dc.titleVolumetric measurements of mandibular incisor root resorption following Forsus FRD EZ2 and Bionator appliance treatment using cone-beam computed tomography: A preliminary studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu