Supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy and cricohyoidoepiglottopexy: functional and oncological results

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridTas, Abdullah/0000-0002-5689-087X
dc.authoridUZUN, CEM/0000-0003-3233-7049
dc.authorwosidUZUN, CEM/K-3307-2012
dc.contributor.authorKarasalihoglu, AR
dc.contributor.authorYagiz, R
dc.contributor.authorTas, A
dc.contributor.authorUzun, C
dc.contributor.authorAdali, MK
dc.contributor.authorKoten, M
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:07:28Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:07:28Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractSixty-eight patients who presented with glottic and glottosupraglottic squamous cell carcinoma and who were managed in this department with supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) with either cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (CHEP) or cricohyoidopexy (CHP), were retrospectively reviewed. The authors analysed the functional and oncological results of the patients. The median follow-up period was 62 months. The average times until decannulation and nasogastric feeding tube removal were 27.7 and 26.4 days, respectively. All patients were successfully decannulated. All patients were able to swallow, but one patient was unable to swallow and had recurrent aspiration. Better functional results were achieved in patients managed with CHEP procedure than the patients managed with CHP procedure. The five-year absolute and cause-specific actuarial survival rates (Kaplan-Meier method) were 78.6 per cent and 93.9 per cent, respectively. The five-year actuarial local control and nodal control rates were 89.5 per cent and 90.4 per cent, respectively. Local recurrence was statistically more likely in patients with positive resection margins (p<0.006). Overall, local control and laryngeal preservation were achieved in 95.6 per cent and 89.7 per cent, respectively. Supracricoid partial laryngectomy procedures (CHEP and CHP) are possible alternatives to total laryngectomy in the treatment of selected advanced glottic and glottosupraglottic carcinomas.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage675en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-2151
dc.identifier.issn1748-5460
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid15509363en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-7044240759en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage671en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/22060
dc.identifier.volume118en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000224917000001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge Univ Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Laryngology And Otologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLaryngeal Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectCarcinomaen_US
dc.subjectSquamous Cellen_US
dc.subjectLaryngectomyen_US
dc.subjectTrue Vocal Corden_US
dc.subjectGlottic Carcinomaen_US
dc.subjectSubtotal Laryngectomyen_US
dc.subjectChemotherapyen_US
dc.titleSupracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy and cricohyoidoepiglottopexy: functional and oncological resultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu