Comparing stroke rehabilitation outcomes between acute inpatient and nonintense home settings
dc.contributor.author | Özdemir, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Birtane, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Tabatabaei, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Kokino, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Ekuklu, G | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-12T10:56:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-12T10:56:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | |
dc.department | Trakya Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare outcomes in stroke survivors who received rehabilitation services in an acute inpatient rehabilitation setting (multidisciplinary rehabilitation team) with outcomes in survivors in a home-based setting (family caregivers, limited team supervision). Design: Randomized clinical trial, with mean follow-up after 60 days. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation setting and home-based settings. Patients: Sixty patients (age range, 43-80yr) who had a stroke between 1996 and 1999 and had been referred after medical stabilization, randomly divided into 2 groups: group 1, inpatient rehabilitation; group 2, home-based rehabilitation. Interventions: Group 1: therapeutical and neuromuscular exercises with occupational therapy with professional supervision; group 2: conventional exercises with family caregiver and limited professional supervision. Main Outcome Measures: Spasticity was evaluated with the Ashworth Scale, motor status with Brunnstrom's stages, functional status with the FIMTM instrument, and cognitive status with the Mini-Mental State Examination before and after rehabilitation. Results: Patients rehabilitated in acute inpatient settings had better motor, functional, and cognitive outcomes (p < .05). Spasticity changes did not differ between the groups. Conclusion: Intense inpatient rehabilitation services for stroke survivors provide significantly more favorable functional and cognitive outcomes with relatively low complications than did nonintense rehabilitation efforts in home settings. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1053/apmr.2001.25973 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 1379 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-9993 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1532-821X | |
dc.identifier.issue | 10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 11588740 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-0034794958 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1375 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.25973 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/19667 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 82 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000171410800005 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | W B Saunders Co-Elsevier Inc | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Archives Of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Cerebrovascular Accident | en_US |
dc.subject | Home Nursing | en_US |
dc.subject | Inpatients | en_US |
dc.subject | Rehabilitation | en_US |
dc.subject | Randomized Controlled-Trial | en_US |
dc.subject | Intensity | en_US |
dc.subject | Discharge | en_US |
dc.title | Comparing stroke rehabilitation outcomes between acute inpatient and nonintense home settings | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |