Comparison of continuous use of thoracic epidural analgesia and intercostal block for pain management after thoracotomy
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2013
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Termedia Publishing House Ltd
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Aim of the study: We aimed to compare the efficacy of the continuous use of thoracic epidural and intercostal analgesia for post-thoracotomy pain. Material and methods: Sixty patients completed a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. The patients were randomized to receive thoracic epidural (group 1, n = 30) or intercostal block (group 2, n = 30) for 24 hours. In both groups, 0.25% bupivacaine was infused at a rate of 5 ml/h through an inserted catheter. Visual analog scale at rest (VAS-R) and after coughing (VAS-C) scores were recorded at baseline and at 1, 6 and 24 hours after surgery to evaluate pain. Morphine consumption, complications and side effects were recorded as well. Results: VAS-R and VAS-C scores were similar at baseline; however, 1st, 6th and 24th hour scores of group 1 were significantly lower than the scores of group 2 (for VAS-R; p = 0.017, p = 0.001, p = 0.023, for VAS-C; p = 0.006, p = 0.002, p = 0.032, respectively). 24-hour morphine consumption was lower in group 1 in comparison to group 2 (p = 0.032). In group 1, 5 out of 30 patients (17%) experienced hypotension, compared with none in group 2 (p = 0.02). Conclusions: For post-thoracotomy pain, better control of analgesia is observed with the thoracic epidural technique; however, intercostal block constitutes an alternative method as it is characterized by lower incidence of hypotension.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Pain, Thoracotomy, Thoracic Epidural Block, Intercostal Nerve Block, Postthoracotomy Pain, Nerve Block, Intravenous Morphine, Pulmonary-Function, Clinical-Trial, Bupivacaine, Anesthesia, Surgery, Relief
Kaynak
Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska
WoS Q Değeri
N/A
Scopus Q Değeri
Q3
Cilt
10
Sayı
3
