Diplopia in Cases With Type 1 Duane Retraction Syndrome

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridBirgul, Ramazan/0000-0001-5097-3087
dc.authorwosidBirgul, Ramazan/AEP-5382-2022
dc.contributor.authorBirgul, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorGurlu, Vuslat
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:59:38Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:59:38Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of diplopia in cases with type 1 Duane retraction syndrome (DRS). Materials and methods This study was a retrospective review of cases involving patients presenting diagnosed with DRS over a period of 24 years. Among these cases, 28 had type I DRS and fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The cases were evaluated in terms of age, gender, affected eye, concomitant ocular motility disorders, presence of amblyopia, manifest shift, abnormal head position (AHP), fusion, and stereopsis. Results Sixteen of the patients (57.1%) in the study were female, and 12 (42.8%) were male; the mean age of the patients was 18.9 years (range: 7-67 years). The right eye was affected in six of the cases (21.4%), and the left eye in 22 (78.6%) of the cases. On examination, diplopia was not observed in 21(75%) cases, but it was detected in seven (25%). AHP was present in five of the seven cases with diplopia and not present in two, and all seven of the diplopic cases had fusion, while three had stereopsis. The level of stereopsis in all diplopic cases was 400 sn/ark. When the clinical findings of patients with diplopia and those without diplopia were compared, a statistically significant difference was observed only in terms of AHP. Conclusions Although diplopia is not one of the clinical features of DRS, it must be noted that in cases with type 1 DRS, diplopia may occur in directions in which the movement of the eyeball is limited. In the presence of this finding, which might mimic sixth nerve palsy, patient history must be diligently taken, other clinical findings of DRS must be thoroughly examined, and an MR1 should be performed when necessary for an easier diagnosis.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7759/cureus.15769
dc.identifier.issn2168-8184
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34164253en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15769
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/20511
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000663827000005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringernatureen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCureus Journal Of Medical Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDiplopiaen_US
dc.subjectStereopsisen_US
dc.subjectAmblyopiaen_US
dc.subjectDuane Retraction Syndromeen_US
dc.subjectFusionen_US
dc.subjectClinical-Featuresen_US
dc.subjectStrabismusen_US
dc.titleDiplopia in Cases With Type 1 Duane Retraction Syndromeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu