Is olecranon osteotomy necessary fort he surgical treatment of distal humerus fractures located close to intra-articular area?

dc.authoridOzcan, Mert/0000-0002-2009-1881
dc.authorwosidÇiftdemir, Mert/AAH-9210-2020
dc.authorwosidYILMAZ, BARIS/A-1070-2018
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Baris
dc.contributor.authorCopuroglu, Cem
dc.contributor.authorCiftdemir, Mert
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Mert
dc.contributor.authorImge, Erdi
dc.contributor.authorSaridogan, Kenan
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:03:23Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:03:23Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical results and necessary of olecranon osteotomy by open reduction and internal fixation by parallel plating of distal humerus located close to intra-articular surface of distal humerus. Materials and Methods: 43 patients were evaluated in this study separated into two groups. In group 1 olecranon osteotomy was performed and in group 2 paratricipital approach was performed to all patients. All patients were evaluated by hospital stay time, follow-up, surgical time, range of motion (ROM), complications and Mayo elbow performance scoring system functions. Results: Mean age was 44.35 +/- 11.61 (19-62) years. There was no statistically significant difference by age, sex, side distribution, hospital stay, follow-up time and ROM. Operation time was 133.04 +/- 18.14 minutes in Group 1 and 171 +/- 15.1 minutes in Group 2. There was statistically significant decrease in surgical time in Group 1 compared to group 2 (p:0.001; p<0.05). There was not any postoperative complication and union was achieved clinically and radiologically in both groups. Mayo elbow score was 85.65 +/- 4.34 while 90.25 +/- 4.13 in group 2 (p:0.001; p<0.05). Conclusion: There was better ROM and functional scores in paratrisipital approach group while only surgical time increased in this group. In conclusion, olecranon osteotomy should not be performed in intra-articular fractures of distal humerus whom treated by open reduction and parallel plating if it is not necessary to protect congruity of joint.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5350/BTDMJB201713303
dc.identifier.endpage126en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-9319
dc.identifier.issn1305-9327
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85029557176en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage122en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5350/BTDMJB201713303
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/21642
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000417444800003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherYerkure Tanitim & Yayincilik Hizmetleri A Sen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Journal Of Bakirkoyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectHumerusen_US
dc.subjectDistal Humerus Fractureen_US
dc.subjectOlecranon Osteotomyen_US
dc.subjectParatrisipital Approachen_US
dc.subjectMayo Elbow Scoreen_US
dc.subjectElbowen_US
dc.subjectExposureen_US
dc.titleIs olecranon osteotomy necessary fort he surgical treatment of distal humerus fractures located close to intra-articular area?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar