The effect of toothbrush abrasion on wear and surface roughness of direct and indirect composite laminate veneer restorations

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridBüyükgöze Dindar, Mediha/0000-0003-3794-4366
dc.authoridTEKBAS ATAY, MELTEM/0000-0002-1762-830X
dc.authorwosidBüyükgöze Dindar, Mediha/AAA-9038-2021
dc.authorwosidTEKBAS ATAY, MELTEM/W-7451-2018
dc.contributor.authorDindar, Mediha Buyukgoze
dc.contributor.authorAtay, Meltem Tekbas
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:58:18Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractDirect and indirect composite laminate veneers have been frequently used, however the wear of composite restorative materials is still a major problem. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the surface roughness and wear of composite laminate veneers made by two different methods after toothbrushing simulation. Material and Methods: Ninety-six upper incisors and canines were divided into two groups: 1-Componeer prefabricated composite veneer (CPV), 2- Uveneer direct composite veneer (UDV). At the UDV group, restorations were made by using Uveneer template system with the same nanofilled composite material (Synergy D6, Coltene, Altstatten, Switzerland) of the prefabricated Componeers'. The initial surface roughness was measured with a profilometer, then the weight was measured. Before the simulation, samples were screened with a 3D extra-oral scanner. Toothbrush simulation was performed at 10,000 rotational strokes with 2.5 N. The measurements were repeated after toothbrushing simulation. Data were analyzed using variance analyses and t-tests (p < 0.05). Results: Before and after polishing, a significant difference was found between two groups' surface roughness in both lateral incisors (p = 0.000, p = 0.000) and canines (p = 0.048, p = 0.001), respectively. After toothbrushing simulation, significant increases were observed in central and lateral incisors' surface roughness with two methods. There was no significant difference between weight loss (p > 0.05). In 3D scans, wear rate was quite similar except UDV group central incisors. Conclusions: Surface roughness of the CPV restorations were less affected after toothbrushing simulation. However, the Uveneer template system, a facilitated treatment procedure compared to the manual buildup of direct restoration, has shown comparable results with CPV's.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTrakya University [2018/179]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by Trakya University with the project numbered 2018/179.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/2051-672X/aha69b
dc.identifier.issn2051-672X
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85089021425en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/aha69b
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/20000
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000763288400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIop Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofSurface Topography-Metrology And Propertiesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectComposite Resinsen_US
dc.subjectDental Microwearen_US
dc.subjectMaterials Testingen_US
dc.subjectSurface Propertiesen_US
dc.subjectToothbrushingen_US
dc.titleThe effect of toothbrush abrasion on wear and surface roughness of direct and indirect composite laminate veneer restorationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu