Working conditions and anxiety levels of employees who have to work during the COVID-19 pandemic

dc.authoridcelikkalp, ulfiye/0000-0002-9945-2984
dc.authoridmetinoglu, meryem/0000-0002-6443-4268
dc.authorwosidÇelikkalp, Ülfiye/ABH-2264-2021
dc.authorwosidmetinoglu, meryem/ABA-8947-2020
dc.contributor.authorCelikkalp, Ulfiye
dc.contributor.authorIrmak, Aylin Yalicin
dc.contributor.authorEkuklu, Galip
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:00:23Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:00:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the anxiety levels of employees by determining the working conditions and protective practices in the workplace of individuals who had to work during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was carried out with 801 employees from different sectors who continued to work during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: The mean age of the employees was 33.1 +/- 10.3 years, and 63.4% were male while 46.1% were workers. The GAD-7 anxiety level mean score of the participants was determined as 6.6 +/- 5.1. Per this, 25.2% of the participants showed a high tendency to anxiety and 38.5% showed a moderate tendency. A statistically significant difference was found between anxiety level and gender, sector and profession. Besides, there was a statistically significant difference between the perception of workplace risk, the way of transportation to the workplace, the social distance in the workplace, measures taken for COVID-19 in the workplace, and anxiety levels (p < 0.05). In the multiple regression analysis, age, gender, work sector, COVID-19 anxiety levels, infection status, knowledge level and life satisfaction levels were determined as effective predictors on common anxiety disorder and explained 23.2% of the developed model variance (R-2 = 0.232, p <= 0.001). CONCLUSION: During the pandemic, it was determined that the anxiety susceptibility levels of the employees were very high and their protective practices against COVID-19 in the workplace were insufficient.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/WOR-210643
dc.identifier.endpage1055en_US
dc.identifier.issn1051-9815
dc.identifier.issn1875-9270
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34842219en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85122128456en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1047en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210643
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/20796
dc.identifier.volume70en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000734505400006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIos Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofWork-A Journal Of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEmployeesen_US
dc.subjectOutbreaken_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectMental-Healthen_US
dc.subjectDisordersen_US
dc.subjectOutbreaken_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectBurnouten_US
dc.titleWorking conditions and anxiety levels of employees who have to work during the COVID-19 pandemicen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar