Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of repair composite to indirect restorative materials
dc.authorid | TEKBAS ATAY, MELTEM/0000-0002-1762-830X | |
dc.authorid | Özcan, Mutlu/0000-0002-9623-6098 | |
dc.authorid | Erdemir, Ugur/0000-0002-4673-8284 | |
dc.authorid | ATAY, MELTEM TEKBAS/0000-0002-1762-830X | |
dc.authorwosid | TEKBAS ATAY, MELTEM/W-7451-2018 | |
dc.authorwosid | Özcan, Mutlu/B-2862-2013 | |
dc.authorwosid | Erdemir, Ugur/ABH-2939-2021 | |
dc.authorwosid | ATAY, MELTEM TEKBAS/F-1130-2018 | |
dc.contributor.author | Mumcu, Emre | |
dc.contributor.author | Erdemir, Ugur | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozsoy, Alev | |
dc.contributor.author | Tekbas-Atay, Meltem | |
dc.contributor.author | Oezcan, Mutlu | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-12T10:50:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-12T10:50:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.department | Trakya Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This study evaluated the effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of a restorative composite to indirect restorative materials. Blocks (5 x 5 x 4 mm(3)) (N = 72) of (a) Zirconia (In-Ceram Zirconia, Vita) (ZR), (b) lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS Empress II, Ivoclar Vivadent) (LD), (c) Indirect resin composite (Gradia, GC) (GR) were fabricated (n = 24 per group) and divided randomly into three groups: 1-Control: no conditioning, 2-Silane coupling agent, 3-Hydrofluoric acid (9.5%) (HF)+silane. Each block was duplicated in resin composite. The adhesion surfaces were conditioned with airborne-particle abrasion (110 mu m Al2O3 particles). Half of the conditioned blocks received no bonding and the other half one coat of bonding (ED Primer II, Kuraray). Each conditioned block was bonded to a composite block with a resin luting agent (Panavia F2.0, Kuraray). The blocks were sectioned into 1 mm(2) microsticks and tested for microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) (0.5 mm/min) in a mu TBS testing machine. Failure types were evaluated under stereomicroscope and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA, Bonferroni corrected and independent sample t-tests (p < 0.05). Significant effect of the bonding (p < 0.001) and surface conditioning (p < 0.001) were observed in all groups. The highest mean bond strength values were obtained in the bonded, HF etched and silanized groups of ZR, LD and GR (12.4 +/- 2.9, 28.1 +/- 1.5 and 27.2 +/- 2 MPa, respectively). HF acid + silane increased the repair bond values in all materials. Majority of the failure types were adhesive for ZR group, whereas HF + silane conditioned LD and GR groups presented predominantly cohesive failures in the cement. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/01694243.2019.1640173 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 2384 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0169-4243 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1568-5616 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 21 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85071712032 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 2369 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1640173 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/18101 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 33 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000476337600001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal Of Adhesion Science And Technology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Adhesion | en_US |
dc.subject | Ceramic | en_US |
dc.subject | Feldspatic Porcelain | en_US |
dc.subject | Microhybrid Composite | en_US |
dc.subject | Repair | en_US |
dc.subject | Surface Conditioning | en_US |
dc.subject | Zirconia | en_US |
dc.subject | Resin Cement | en_US |
dc.subject | Luting Cement | en_US |
dc.subject | Flexural Strength | en_US |
dc.subject | Volume Loss | en_US |
dc.subject | Zirconia | en_US |
dc.subject | Agents | en_US |
dc.subject | Porcelain | en_US |
dc.subject | Alumina | en_US |
dc.subject | Systems | en_US |
dc.subject | Durability | en_US |
dc.title | Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of repair composite to indirect restorative materials | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |