A comparison of the accuracy of Willems' and Cameriere's methods based on panoramic radiography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridÖzveren, Neslihan/0000-0002-1090-5415
dc.authoridcameriere, roberto/0000-0002-3775-2244
dc.authoridMeric, Pamir/0000-0002-4655-5664
dc.authorwosidMeriç, Pamir/AAF-2482-2021
dc.authorwosidSerindere, Gozde/HPH-0265-2023
dc.authorwosidÖzveren, Neslihan/AAO-4681-2020
dc.contributor.authorOzveren, Neslihan
dc.contributor.authorSerindere, Gozde
dc.contributor.authorMeric, Pamir
dc.contributor.authorCameriere, Roberto
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:02:09Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:02:09Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractTooth development evaluation is majorly the current approach to identify age and maturity. Dental age (DA) is therefore considerably emphasized in forensic and pediatric dentistry. The aim of this study was to assess the applicability of Willems and Cameriere methods for Turkish children. Panoramic images of 636 Turkish healthy children (319 male; 317 female) aged between 6 and 15 years were assessed. DA of the subjects was determined by using Willems and Cameriere methods. The seven right and left permanent lower teeth were valued using these two methods. The mean chronological age (CA) of the subjects was 11.53 +/- 2.25 (min:6, max:14.99) years (boys: 11.29 +/- 2.34 years, girls: 11.77 +/- 2.15 years). Willems method overestimated the CA (p <= 0.001), in contrast, Cameriere method underestimated the CA (p <= 0.001) for both sexes. In different age groups the mean difference between the CA and DA calculated by Cameriere method (CA-DA) ranged from 0.86 to -0.41 years for boys and from 1.00 to -0.21 years for girls, while the mean difference between the CA and DA calculated by Willems method ranged from -0.26 to -0.71 years for boys and from 0.19 to -0.76 years for girls. Cameriere method provided a better percentage of accuracy (84.6% and 77.3% for males and females, respectively) in the absolute difference values within 1 year compared to Willems method. Cameriere method performed slightly better but, both methods may be used for DA estimation in the Turkish population. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109912
dc.identifier.issn0379-0738
dc.identifier.issn1872-6283
dc.identifier.pmid31408787en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85070272869en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109912
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/21170
dc.identifier.volume302en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000496801100059en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofForensic Science Internationalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectForensic Scienceen_US
dc.subjectDental Ageen_US
dc.subjectCameriere Methoden_US
dc.subjectWillems Methoden_US
dc.subjectPanoramic Radiographyen_US
dc.subjectDental Age Estimationen_US
dc.subjectOpen Apicesen_US
dc.subjectTurkish Childrenen_US
dc.subjectApplicabilityen_US
dc.subjectDemirjianen_US
dc.subjectTeethen_US
dc.titleA comparison of the accuracy of Willems' and Cameriere's methods based on panoramic radiographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu