Comparison of two surgical approaches for treating vitiligo

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridÇetinkale, Oğuz/0000-0003-3937-7174
dc.authoridÇetinkale, Oğuz/0000-0003-3937-7174
dc.authoridTuzun, Binnur/0000-0002-5583-9677
dc.authorwosidÇetinkale, Oğuz/D-4011-2019
dc.authorwosidTuzun, Yalcin/B-6333-2015
dc.authorwosidÇetinkale, Oğuz/AAA-8123-2021
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, M
dc.contributor.authorÇetinkale, O
dc.contributor.authorWolf, R
dc.contributor.authorKotogyan, A
dc.contributor.authorMat, C
dc.contributor.authorTüzün, B
dc.contributor.authorTüzün, Y
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:20:00Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:20:00Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground Surgical techniques have recently been introduced for patients with vitiligo. Randomized controlled trials have not been performed. Aim To compare the efficacy and side-effects of two surgical methods (suction blister vs. thin split-thickness graft technique) for the treatment of vitillgo. Methods Three suction blisters, approximately 0.8 cm in diameter, made with a special tool attached to a vacuum extractor, which were converted to erosions by removal of the roofs of the bullae, and one round erosion of approximately the same diameter, made using a silver knife, were created. One roof of a blister and two cutaneous thin split-thickness grafts taken from the gluteal region were transferred onto recipient vitiliginous areas; one was left alone. The results were evaluated by one non-blind and two blind observers bimonthly during the 3-month follow-up period. Results Repigmentation rates were 25-65% in the suction blister technique and 90% in the thin split-thickness graft technique (P < 0.001). Conclusions The thin split-thickness graft technique is superior to the suction blister technique in treating vitiligo.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1365-4362.2002.01391.x
dc.identifier.endpage138en_US
dc.identifier.issn0011-9059
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid12010337en_US
dc.identifier.startpage135en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.2002.01391.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/25420
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000175668300003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal Of Dermatologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectStable Vitiligoen_US
dc.subjectTransplantationen_US
dc.subjectRepigmentationen_US
dc.subjectMelanocytesen_US
dc.subjectLesionsen_US
dc.subjectPuvaen_US
dc.titleComparison of two surgical approaches for treating vitiligoen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu