Which Classification System is More Useful for Intertrochanteric Fractures? AO/ASIF or Jensen?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorMemisoglu, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorEskin, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorYamak, Erkan
dc.contributor.authorGuerbuez, Aydin
dc.contributor.authorSaridogan, Kenan
dc.contributor.authorDuelger, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:03:56Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:03:56Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to determine intra- and interobserver reliability of AO/ASIF and Jensen classification systems, and to compare reliability when applied by unexperienced and experienced orthopaedic surgeons. Patients and Methods: The anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of 60 intertrochanteric hip fractures were reviewed and classified by two groups (G1, G2) of orthopaedic surgeons using the AO and Jensen classification systems on two separate occasions three months apart. Each group consisted of five orthopaedic surgeons. Group 1 had less than five years, and group 2 had more than 10 years of experience. Kappa statistical analysis was used for determination of intra- and interobserver variation. Results: For the AO classification system without subgroups, the mean kappa value was 0.67 (range 0.47-0.90) for intraobserver variation and 0.42 (range 0.10-0.73) for interobserver variation. For the Jensen classification, the mean kappa value was 0.57 (range 0.35-0.80) for intraobserver variation and 0.30 (range 0.10-0.60) for interobserver variation. For the AO classification system with subgroups, the mean kappa value was 0.49 (range 0.21-0.81) for intraobserver variation and 0.23 (range 0.09-0.51) for interobserver variation. Conclusion: Although these classification systems have disadvantages, this study suggests that AO system without subgroups is more useful than Jensen and AO system with subgroups to classify intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage185en_US
dc.identifier.issn1301-3149
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage181en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/21850
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000261815500003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAves Yayincilik, Ibrahim Karaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTrakya Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectIntertrochanteric Femur Fracturesen_US
dc.subjectClassificationen_US
dc.subjectObserveren_US
dc.subjectNeer-Classificationen_US
dc.subjectProximal Femuren_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectAgreementen_US
dc.titleWhich Classification System is More Useful for Intertrochanteric Fractures? AO/ASIF or Jensen?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Trakya Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi