Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of theInformation in Testicular Cancer Self-examVideos Shared on YouTube

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTaş, Tuncay
dc.contributor.authorArda, Ersan
dc.contributor.authorÇakıroğlu, Basri
dc.contributor.authorUçar, Taha
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:05:33Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:05:33Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to assess the testicular cancer self-examination (TSE) videos on YouTube. Material and Methods: This study was conducted to evaluate the content, reliability and quality of internet videos related to TSE. The search engine of YouTube® was queried for the keyword ‘TSE’ in April 01, 2019. Videos were scaled according to the time since upload day, running time, number of comments and number of like/dislike. All videos were also categorized according to source into 3 groups: Health information websites/TV programs; independent users; university channels/medical professionals. DISCERN questionnaire score (DISCERN) Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria (JAMAS), Global Quality Scores (GQS), TSE-Comprehensiveness (TSE-C) and Video Power Index (VPI) were used. Results: Total of 68 videos were included and 32 of videos were excluded due to being unrelated or repeated. When VPI values were examined according to the video source, there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). According to the video source, there was a statistically significant difference in terms of DISCERN scores (p=0.049) and TSE-C scores (p=0.019). DISCERN scores of the videos whose source is university channels/medical professionals are higher than the DISCERN scores of the videos whose source is independent users (p=0.042). There was a statistically significant difference in terms of JAMAS scores (p=0.009). Conclusion: It is concluded that the information of TSE videos on YouTube is a weak source when evaluated in terms of reliability, benefit and quality.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5336/urology.2020-78508
dc.identifier.endpage87en_US
dc.identifier.issn2587-0483
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage80en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid420909en_US]
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5336/urology.2020-78508
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/420909
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/13513
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Reconstructive Urologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of theInformation in Testicular Cancer Self-examVideos Shared on YouTubeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu