Performance of the new American College of Rheumatology classification criteria in Turkish systemic sclerosis patients: a multicenter study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridBALCI, Mehmet Ali/0000-0003-0597-7788;
dc.authorwosidBALCI, Mehmet Ali/M-7089-2015
dc.authorwosidCakir, Necati/AAG-7283-2019
dc.contributor.authorPamuk, Omer Nuri
dc.contributor.authorBalci, Mehmet Ali
dc.contributor.authorOnat, Ahmet Mesut
dc.contributor.authorZengin, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorCakir, Necati
dc.contributor.authorKisacik, Bunyamin
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:50:29Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:50:29Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn our study, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of the new ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria to the ACR 1980 criteria in our systemic sclerosis (SSc) population. Three rheumatology centers from Turkey participated into this study. The medical records of SSc patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed, and their features at disease onset were recorded. Patients admitted to each center within the same time period for conditions other than SSc, in whom ANA was positive and was deemed necessary within the diagnostic workup, were included as controls. One hundred and ninety-seven SSc patients (174 females, 23 males) and 103 controls (96 females, 7 males) were included. Limited cutaneous SSc was present in 68 % of patients, and 30.5 % had diffuse SSc. The sensitivity of ACR/EULAR 2013 and ACR 1980 criteria were, respectively, 94.4 and 85.3 % (p = 0.003). The specificity of ACR/EULAR 2013 and ACR 1980 criteria were, respectively, 98.1 and 100 %. According to the new criteria, 13 patients were misclassified; however, according to the ACR 1980 criteria, 29 patients were misclassified (p = 0.005). The sensitivity of ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria was significantly better than that of the ACR 1980 criteria in limited cutaneous SSc group (94.8 vs. 82.8 %). In patients whose disease duration was < 3 years, the new criteria had better sensitivity than the previous criteria (92.7 vs. 78.1 %, p = 0.006). The new ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria for SSc had better sensitivity in Turkish SSc patients, and less patients were misclassified.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10067-015-3138-0
dc.identifier.endpage361en_US
dc.identifier.issn0770-3198
dc.identifier.issn1434-9949
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26643772en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84958185424en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage357en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-015-3138-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/18006
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000370821300011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer London Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Rheumatologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectACR Criteriaen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectSensitivityen_US
dc.subjectSpecificityen_US
dc.subjectSystemic Sclerosisen_US
dc.subjectLeagueen_US
dc.titlePerformance of the new American College of Rheumatology classification criteria in Turkish systemic sclerosis patients: a multicenter studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu