Evaluation of gestational age based on ultrasound petal growth measurements

dc.contributor.authorVarol, F
dc.contributor.authorSaltik, A
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, PB
dc.contributor.authorKilic, T
dc.contributor.authorYardim, T
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:02:36Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:02:36Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractMonitoring fetal growth and assessing its predictors have important place in antenatal care management. Accurate prediction of gestational age (GA) and birth weight (BW) is clinically important. Standard growth curve chosen should be evaluated to see if it satisfies the criteria for a valid assesment. In this paper, for the purpose of contributing to develop national standards and to evaluate Hadlock's standard data pertaining to 1411 fetuses were examined. Of 1411 normally growing fetuses, one measurement for AC, BPD and FL was taken by ultrasound. GA was assessed via menstrual history which is also confirmed by ultrasonography. Several variables, AC, BPD, FL, FL/AC, BPD/FL and dependent variables (GA & BW) were modelled mathematically. Percentile values, correlation coefficients were calculated and well functioning regression equations were produced for the fetal growth evaluation. Simple correlation model re-confirmed that AC, BPD and FL were well predictors of GA. Via modelling by multivariate regression analysis (adj. R-2 = 937), GA=4.945 (95% CI: 4.661-5.654) +.606 AC + .105 BPD +.286 FL can be estimated. It couldn't be possible establishing an appropriate equation for prediction of BW vith current data. Our study is intended to draw an attention on requirement of national standards although Hadlock's standard growth curve may evaluate fetal development accurately. Forming comprehensive cohort group is under our consideration. The equation we developped (shown in the results), might be a working contribution.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3349/ymj.2001.42.3.299
dc.identifier.endpage303en_US
dc.identifier.issn0513-5796
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid11456395en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0035379827en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage299en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2001.42.3.299
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/21353
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000169726200005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherYonsei Univ College Medicineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofYonsei Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGestational Ageen_US
dc.subjectBiparietal Diameteren_US
dc.subjectFemur Lengthen_US
dc.subjectAbdominal Circumferenceen_US
dc.subjectFetal Growth Predictionen_US
dc.subjectAbdominal Circumferenceen_US
dc.subjectMenstrual Ageen_US
dc.subjectPredictoren_US
dc.titleEvaluation of gestational age based on ultrasound petal growth measurementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar