Microhardness and SEM-EDX Analysis of Permanent Enamel Surface Adjacent to Fluoride-releasing Restorative Materials Under Severe Cariogenic Challenges

dc.authoridOzdemir, Serife/0000-0003-4003-0530
dc.authoridÖzveren, Neslihan/0000-0002-1090-5415
dc.authorwosidOzdemir, Serife/A-1748-2016
dc.authorwosidÖzveren, Neslihan/AAO-4681-2020
dc.contributor.authorOzveren, Neslihan
dc.contributor.authorOzalp, Serife
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:02:03Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:02:03Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: In this study, the protective effects of restorative materials with fluoride content, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC), giomer, and glass carbomer against artificial initial caries lesions in a simulated highly cariogenic oral environment were evaluated. Considering the reported recharging abilities of these restorative materials, fluoridated toothpaste was applied to some groups, in which the anti-demineralising effect was also evaluated. Materials and Methods: Two enamel blocks were produced from each of 60 sound permanent molars. Sixty specimens were used for microhardness analysis, and the rest were used for SEM-EDX analysis. Enamel specimens were randomly assigned to three groups according to the restorative material: A = resin-modified glass-ionomer cement; B = giomer; C = glass carbomer. Artificial initial caries lesions were created using demineralising solutions, after which specimens were exposed to in vitro pH cycling simulating a highly cariogenic oral environment. Microhardness and mineral analyses were performed on the enamel surrounding the restorative materials at three different times during the experiment: at the beginning of the experiment, then after the creation of the artificial early caries lesions, and finally after pH cycling. Results: Microhardness and SEM-EDX results mostly confirmed each other. RMGIC and glass carbomer groups with added fluoride toothpaste showed statitsically significantly better anti-demineralising effects in comparison to other groups. Neither of the giomer groups performed as well as RMGIC or glass carbomer. Conclusion: Because of the similarity between the demineralisation inhibitory activity of glass carbomer and RMGIC, glass carbomer may be preferred as a restorative material in paediatric dentistry.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBezmialem Vakif University Research Foundation [12.2014/12, 71306642-050.01.04]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a grant from Bezmialem Vakif University Research Foundation (12.2014/12). Ethical approval protocol No. 71306642-050.01.04en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.ohpd.a41363
dc.identifier.endpage424en_US
dc.identifier.issn1602-1622
dc.identifier.issn1757-9996
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30460354en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85056803397en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage417en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.a41363
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/21130
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000453409100005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOral Health & Preventive Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFluorideen_US
dc.subjectGiomeren_US
dc.subjectGlass Carbomeren_US
dc.subjectResin-Modified Glass Ionomeren_US
dc.subjectSEM-EDXen_US
dc.subjectGlass-Ionomer Cementen_US
dc.subjectDental Materialsen_US
dc.subjectInhibitionen_US
dc.subjectDentifricesen_US
dc.subjectInterfaceen_US
dc.subjectLesionsen_US
dc.titleMicrohardness and SEM-EDX Analysis of Permanent Enamel Surface Adjacent to Fluoride-releasing Restorative Materials Under Severe Cariogenic Challengesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar