Comparison between electronic method and conventional method recording and follow-up of general surgery ward-round notes taken

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridIbis, Cem/0000-0002-5602-375X;
dc.authorwosidIbis, Cem/AAE-3388-2020
dc.authorwosidOguz, Serhat/HKE-2793-2023
dc.authorwosidSenlikci, Abdullah/AAI-8432-2020
dc.contributor.authorAydin, I.
dc.contributor.authorYeldan, E.
dc.contributor.authorIbis, A. C.
dc.contributor.authorAlbayrak, D.
dc.contributor.authorOguz, S.
dc.contributor.authorSenlikci, A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:15:54Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:15:54Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim. Patient anamneses and ward-rounds notes taken are two key elements which have been and will be used to ensure accurate and reliable sustainability at surgery services. In this study, we aimed to find a new method which is capable of better addressing the needs in this process, simplifying it and also saving time. We also targeted to compare this new method used by us with the method, also known as conventional method, having been used for years. Methods. Thirty patients were included in the study. The prehospitalization anamneses of the patients were taken using the two methods and the durations were recorded separately for the two methods. Thereafter, the patients were visited by two methods in the morning on each day of their stay. The durations were recorded daily and separately for the two methods. The durations were statistically evaluated separately for the anamneses and ward-round notes taken. Results. Evaluations showed that the method using hand terminal (1.2250 minutes) is more advantageous in terms of duration in recording ward-round scores than the conventional method (1.3853 minutes). It was founded that in regard to the duration, the average duration of manual anamnesis taking (16.3350 minutes) is higher than that of taking anamnesis by means of hand terminal (15.4733 minutes). Furthermore, it was also seen that the use of this new technique eliminated the problems previously experienced in data transfer, access to historical data etc. Conclusion. In conclusion, this method that is tested by use of hand terminal is more advantageous than the conventional method in terms of time saving and accurate data transfer. It is our opinion that it will provide advantages in many more aspects if it is worked on.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage336en_US
dc.identifier.issn0026-4733
dc.identifier.issn1827-1626
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25493394en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84926226707en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage331en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/24106
dc.identifier.volume69en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000348011000004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEdizioni Minerva Medicaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMinerva Chirurgicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Procedures, Operativeen_US
dc.subjectElectronic Health Recordsen_US
dc.subjectHealth Care Evaluation Mechanismsen_US
dc.titleComparison between electronic method and conventional method recording and follow-up of general surgery ward-round notes takenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu