Sonography of the Chest Using Linear-Array versus Sector Transducers: Correlation with Auscultation, Chest Radiography, and Computed Tomography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorwosid, osman/HRD-6024-2023
dc.authorwosid, Osman/AGR-7980-2022
dc.contributor.authorTasci, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorHatipoglu, Osman Nuri
dc.contributor.authorCagli, Bekir
dc.contributor.authorErmis, Veli
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:16:17Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:16:17Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose. The primary purpose of our study was to compare the efficacies of two sonographic (US) probes, a high-frequency linear-array probe and a lower-frequency phased-array sector probe in the diagnosis of basic thoracic pathologies. The secondary purpose was to compare the diagnostic performance of thoracic US with auscultation and chest radiography (CXR) using thoracic CT as a gold standard. Methods. In total, 55 consecutive patients scheduled for thoracic CT were enrolled in this prospective study. Four pathologic entities were evaluated: pneumothorax, pleural effusion, consolidation, and interstitial syndrome. A portable US scanner was used with a 5-10-MHz linear-array probe and a 1-5-MHz phased-array sector probe. The first probe used was chosen randomly. US, CXR, and auscultation results were compared with the CT results. Results. The linear-array probe had the highest performance in the identification of pneumothorax (83% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 99% diagnostic accuracy) and pleural effusion (100% sensitivity, 97% specificity, and 98% diagnostic accuracy); the sector probe had the highest performance in the identification of consolidation (89% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 95% diagnostic accuracy) and interstitial syndrome (94% sensitivity, 93% specificity, and 94% diagnostic accuracy). For all pathologies, the performance of US was superior to those of CXR and auscultation. Conclusions. The linear probe is superior to the sector probe for identifying pleural pathologies, whereas the sector probe is superior to the linear probe for identifying parenchymal pathologies. Thoracic US has better diagnostic performance than CXR and auscultation for the diagnosis of common pathologic conditions of the chest. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jcu.22331
dc.identifier.endpage389en_US
dc.identifier.issn0091-2751
dc.identifier.issn1097-0096
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26863904en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85027958400en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage383en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22331
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/24268
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000382808900008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Clinical Ultrasounden_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectThoraxen_US
dc.subjectLungen_US
dc.subjectPleuraen_US
dc.subjectProbeen_US
dc.subjectEffusionen_US
dc.subjectPneumothoraxen_US
dc.subjectConsolidationen_US
dc.subjectInterstitial Syndromeen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonographyen_US
dc.subjectLung Ultrasound Signen_US
dc.subjectNomenclature Committeeen_US
dc.subjectFleischner-Societyen_US
dc.subjectRecommendationsen_US
dc.subjectGlossaryen_US
dc.subjectTermsen_US
dc.titleSonography of the Chest Using Linear-Array versus Sector Transducers: Correlation with Auscultation, Chest Radiography, and Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu