Is Resonance Frequency Analysis a Reliable Evaluation for Primary Stability of Implants Without Apical Contact?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridBilmenoglu, Caglar/0000-0002-2580-9899
dc.authoridÖzyurt, Anıl/0000-0002-3243-3156
dc.authorwosidBilmenoglu, Caglar/HGE-5706-2022
dc.authorwosidÖzyurt, Anıl/AAY-5407-2020
dc.contributor.authorOzyurt, Anil
dc.contributor.authorBilmenoglu, Caglar
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:52:18Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:52:18Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The primary stability of dental implants is one of the most crucial factors for providing long-term success of osseointegration. Vertical deficiencies, such as those due to maxillary sinus pneumatization, may cause a severe vertical limitation to residual bone height. This study aimed to examine the primary stabilization of implants without apical contacts. Materials and Methods: Eighty bone-level implants (4.1-mm diameter/10-mm length) were placed into polyurethane test blocks without apical contacts. According to coronal bone-to-implant contact, groups were set as 4,6, 8, and 10 mm, respectively. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) using a SmartPeg was performed separately toward the transversal and horizontal axes by two independent researchers. Data were statistically compared for interobserver and among groups. Results: Interobserver reliability varied from moderate to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.629 to 0.985). There were no significant differences among the 6 mm, 8 mm, and 10 mm groups, although the 4 mm group showed the significantly lowest stability (P < .001). Transversal and longitudinal measurements of the same groups did not show a parallel correlation statistically. Conclusion: RFA values may be affected by the finger torque in tightening of the SmartPeg among different researchers. Fully placed implants did not significantly show the highest stability among various apically contactless groups. Consequently, RFA should not be used alone to evaluate primary stability for implants without an apical contact.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/jomi.9480
dc.identifier.endpage548en_US
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.issn1942-4434
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35727246en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85132304797en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage543en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9480
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/18670
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000823579500016en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal Of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectApically Contactlessen_US
dc.subjectDental Implanten_US
dc.subjectPrimary Stabilityen_US
dc.subjectResonance Frequency Analysisen_US
dc.subjectSinus Floor Elevationen_US
dc.subjectAtrophic Posterior Maxillaen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Techniqueen_US
dc.subjectInsertion Torqueen_US
dc.subjectCollar Designen_US
dc.subjectBoneen_US
dc.subjectPlacementen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectSurfaceen_US
dc.subjectShapeen_US
dc.titleIs Resonance Frequency Analysis a Reliable Evaluation for Primary Stability of Implants Without Apical Contact?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu