Quality, reliability, and popularity of YouTube videos on urticaria: a cross-sectional analysis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridSarikaya Solak, Sezgi/0000-0002-8572-8249
dc.authoridKaya, özge/0000-0001-8062-1664
dc.authorwosidSarikaya Solak, Sezgi/A-4789-2016
dc.authorwosidKaya, özge/GWZ-2582-2022
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Oezge
dc.contributor.authorSolak, Sezgi S.
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:16:59Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:16:59Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Recently, YouTube has been frequently used by non-physicians and physicians to share information and experiences about diseases. This study aims to compare videos uploaded to YouTube about urticaria in terms of quality, reliability, usefulness, and popularity based on the uploaded source.METHODS: YouTube was searched using the keyword urticaria. From the search returns, we selected the first 60 videos created by physicians and the first 60 videos created by non-physicians. We compared the two sets of videos in terms of reliability, usefulness, quality, and popularity using the Video Power Index (VPI) score, DISCERN score, global quality score (GQS) and usefulness score.RESULTS: The mean DISCERN score, GQS, and usefulness score were statistically significantly higher (P<0.001) for videos uploaded by physicians than those uploaded by non-physicians. Although not statistically significant, the median number of likes and comments, the rate of views, and the VPI scores were higher for videos uploaded by the non-physician group. The mean DISCERN scores, GQS, and usefulness scores were statistically significantly higher (P<0.001) for videos uploaded by specialist physicians (dermatologists and allergists) than for those uploaded by non-specialists. Specialist physicians mentioned medical treatment for the condition more than non-specialists, which was statisti-cally significant (P<0.001).CONCLUSIONS: YouTube videos about urticaria uploaded by physicians, especially specialists, are of higher quality, reliable and useful, but videos uploaded by non-physicians are more popular and have higher viewing rates.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.23736/S2784-8671.23.07588-6
dc.identifier.endpage352en_US
dc.identifier.issn2784-8671
dc.identifier.issn2784-8450
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37539503en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85166517300en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage347en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.23736/S2784-8671.23.07588-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/24531
dc.identifier.volume158en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001062303500008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEdizioni Minerva Medicaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofItalian Journal Of Dermatology And Venereologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectUrticariaen_US
dc.subjectSocial Mediaen_US
dc.subjectInterneten_US
dc.subjectInformationen_US
dc.titleQuality, reliability, and popularity of YouTube videos on urticaria: a cross-sectional analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu