Evaluation of the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos addressing eyelid ptosis surgery

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridSakallıoğlu, Ahmet Kürşad/0000-0003-1206-9753
dc.authoridGarip, Ruveyde/0000-0003-2235-9017
dc.authorwosidSakallıoğlu, Ahmet Kürşad/ADG-0599-2022
dc.contributor.authorGarip, Ruveyde
dc.contributor.authorSakallioglu, Ahmet Kursad
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:00:08Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:00:08Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the educational content, quality, and reliability of YouTube videos addressing anterior approach ptosis surgery. Methods: A search on YouTube using the term ptosis surgery was performed between March 20 and March 26 2021. The quality, reliability, and accuracy of the contents of 38 videos meeting the inclusion criteria were evaluated by two independent ophthalmologists using the DISCERN questionnaire and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria. The Global Quality Score (GQS) and a surgical scoring system were used to assess the educational value of the content. Results: The mean DISCERN score was 32.8 +/- 10, and the mean JAMA score was 1.3 +/- 0.5, indicating poor quality; the mean global quality score was 3.1 +/- 1.1, indicating moderate quality; and the mean surgical score was 7.5 +/- 2.7, indicating moderate to good quality. The surgical, DISCERN, and GQS scores of the videos uploaded by physicians were significantly higher than those of the videos uploaded by private clinics (p = .015, p = .049, and p = .01, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation between the surgical, DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores (p < .001). A significant positive correlation was found between video duration and surgical score (p = .013), DISCERN score (p < 0.001), and GQS score (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Videos with known sources, uploaded by physicians, and supported by audio narration may be useful in obtaining educational information. However, the available videos are not a reliable source of educational information about ptosis surgery.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01676830.2021.1989467
dc.identifier.endpage604en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-6830
dc.identifier.issn1744-5108
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34713759en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85118390116en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage598en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2021.1989467
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/20693
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000712704400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOrbit-The International Journal On Orbital Disorders-Oculoplastic And Lacrimal Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectEyelid Ptosisen_US
dc.subjectPtosis Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Videoen_US
dc.subjectYoutubeen_US
dc.subjectInformationen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos addressing eyelid ptosis surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu