The effect of periodontal prophylaxis procedures on the surface properties of tooth-colored restorative materials

dc.authoridTEKBAS ATAY, MELTEM/0000-0002-1762-830X
dc.authoridAcikgoz-Alparslan, Ece/0000-0003-4560-6156
dc.authoridBüyükgöze Dindar, Mediha/0000-0003-3794-4366
dc.authorwosidTEKBAS ATAY, MELTEM/W-7451-2018
dc.authorwosidAcikgoz-Alparslan, Ece/HTL-4009-2023
dc.authorwosidBüyükgöze Dindar, Mediha/AAA-9038-2021
dc.contributor.authorAcikgoz-Alparslan, Ece
dc.contributor.authorBuyukgoze-Dindar, Mediha
dc.contributor.authorTekbas-Atay, Meltem
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:58:18Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to investigate the effect of various periodontal hygiene procedures on the surface properties of direct and indirect restorative materials. Disc-shaped specimens (10 x 2 mm) of FC: Flowable Composite, UC: Universal Composite, IC: Indirect Composite, CC: CAD/CAM Composite were fabricated (n = 70) and divided randomly into subgroups: 1-Control, 2-US: Ultrasonic scaling, 3-RP: Rubber-cup polishing, 4-AP: Air-polishing, 5-US+RP, 6-US+AP, 7-US+AP+RP. The color, surface roughness, and gloss measurements were performed. Data were analyzed with variance analysis and the correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between surface properties (p < 0.05). The highest and lowest roughness values were obtained in FC after US and CC's control group, respectively. The surface roughness of FC, IC, and CC was significantly affected by the application of various prophylaxis procedures (p < 0.05). AP and US+AP+RP presented the least and most affected surface roughness, respectively. The lowest surface gloss value was in the US and RP subgroups of FC. The process that the least reduced the surface gloss was AP. Material and procedure affected the color stability (p < 0.05) except for CC. The highest Delta E values were obtained in US+AP+RP subgroups. Indirect restorative materials showed less roughness and color change as well as higher gloss values after all periodontal prophylaxis procedures. The use of air-polishing has proven to be a reliable periodontal hygiene approach for direct and indirect restorations due to the less deterioration in the surface properties.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [220S228]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK), (Project Number: 220S228). Authors would like to thank the company Ivoclar Vivadent for providing the Tetric N-Flow composites.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/2051-672X/ac6f73
dc.identifier.issn2051-672X
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85130983635en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/ac6f73
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/19999
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000801045500001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIop Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofSurface Topography-Metrology And Propertiesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectComposite Resinen_US
dc.subjectDental Polishingen_US
dc.subjectDental Scalingen_US
dc.subjectSurface Glossen_US
dc.subjectSurface Roughnessen_US
dc.subjectRoughnessen_US
dc.titleThe effect of periodontal prophylaxis procedures on the surface properties of tooth-colored restorative materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar