Yazar "Kaplan, Mehmet Ali" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe THE ACCESS RATE TO DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT MODALITIES IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS IN TURKEY; MULTICENTER OBSERVATIONAL STUDY(Aves, 2011) Saip, Pinar; Keskin, Serkan; Ozkan, Metin; Kaplan, Mehmet Ali; Aydogan, Fatma; Demirag, Guzin Gonullu; Uzunoglu, SernazPurpose: We aimed to determine the elapsed time between the first notification of the disease and the accession to the diagnosis and treatment modalities and its associated factors in female patients with breast cancer in Turkey. Patients and Methods: The data was acquired by a questionnaire completed by 535 patients who applied to the 14 various oncology clinics between 1st and 28th of February 2010 in Turkey. The centers located in metrople - Istanbul, Izmir, and Ankara- were named Group 1 (n= 161), the centers located in Marmara and Central Anatolia region - Kocaeli, Bursa, Edirne and Kayseri- were named Group 2 (n= 189), and the centers located in Karadeniz and East-Southeast Anatolia region - Zonguldak, Samsun, Trabzon, Elazig and Diyarbakir- were named Group 3 (n= 185). The grouping for the centers were configured according to their socio- economic development of provinces. Results: Median age was 48 +/- 11.2 (24- 89) years, the number of patients of age less than 50 years were 282 (% 56.1). 85% of the patients detected a mass in their breast by themselves. % 27 of the patients over age 50 never had a breast ultrasound and/ or mammography done until the definite diagnosis was established. The median elapsed time between the disease noticed by the patient and the application to a health care center was 10 days, between the application and the biopsy was 19 days, between the biopsy and the surgery was 31 days. The elapsed time between recognition of the disease by the patient and the patient applying to a health care center in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 was 15, 10 and 14 days, respectively, and the elapsed time between the biopsy and surgery was 14, 1.5 and 12 days, respectively. The elasped time between the first recognition of the disease and applying of the patient to the health care center and the elapsed time between the biopsy and surgery in Group 2 centers was statistically significantly shorter compared to group 1 and 3 centers (p< 0.05). Conclusions: A high level of awareness of breast cancer in our country has examined through the time that is defined as 10 days between recognition of the disease and medical application. Compared with the developed countries the elapsed time between the application and biopsy, surgery and systemic therapy is longer than the expected and it has been marked differences between regions.Öğe Efficacy and safety of raltitrexed combinations with uracil-tegafur or Mitomycin C as salvage treatment in advanced colorectal cancer patients.(Amer Soc Clinical Oncology, 2014) Ozkan, Metin; Bozkurt, Oktay; Karaca, Halit; Ozaslan, Ersin; Daloglu, Osman Onur; Ciltas, Aydin; Kaplan, Mehmet Ali[Abstract Not Available]Öğe Efficiency and Side Effects of Sorafenib Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study by the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology(Asian Pacific Organization Cancer Prevention, 2013) Berk, Veli; Kaplan, Mehmet Ali; Tonyali, Onder; Buyukberber, Suleyman; Balakan, Ozan; Ozkan, Metin; Demirci, UmutBackground: Inoperable and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with a poor prognosis and low chemotherapeutic efficiency. Sorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor exerting its effects via the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and platelet derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFR-beta) tyrosine kinases. Randomized studies have shown a significant contribution of sorafenib to life expectancy and quality of life of cancer patients. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of sorafenib therapy in Turkey. Materials and Methods: Data for 103 patients (82 males, 21 females) receiving sorafenib therapy in 13 centers from February 2008 to December 2012 were evaluated. Median age was 61 years and median ECOG performance status was 1 (range: 0-2). 60 patients (58%) had hepatitis B, 15 patients (15%) had hepatitis C infection and 12 patients (12%) had a history of alcohol consumption. All of the patients had Child scores meeting the utilization permit of the drug in our country (Child A). Results: A total of 571 cycles of sorafenib therapy were administered with a median of four per patient. Among the evaluable cases, there was partial response in 15 (15%), stable disease in 52 (50%), and progressive disease in 36 (35%). Median progression-free survival was 18 weeks and median overall survival was 48 weeks. The dose was reduced only in 6 patients and discontinued in 2 patients due to grade 3-4 toxicity, 18 patients (17%) suffering hand-foot syndrome, 7 (7%) diarrhea, and 2 (2%) vomiting. Conclusions: This retrospective study demonstrated better efficacy of sorafenib therapy in patients with advanced HCC compared to the literature while progression-free survival and overall survival findings were comparable. The side effect rates indicate that the drug was tolerated well. In conclusion, among the available treatment options, sorafenib is an efficient and tolerable agent in patients with inoperable or metastatic HCC.