Yazar "Inanc, Nevsun" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Assessment of the New 2012 EULAR/ACR Clinical Classification Criteria for Polymyalgia Rheumatica: A Prospective Multicenter Study(J Rheumatol Publ Co, 2016) Ozen, Gulsen; Inanc, Nevsun; Unal, Ali Ugur; Bas, Seda; Kimyon, Gezmis; Kisacik, Bunyamin; Onat, Ahmet MesutObjective. To assess the performance of the new 2012 provisional European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ American College of Rheumatology (ACR) polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) clinical classification criteria in discriminating PMR from other mimicking conditions compared with the previous 5 diagnostic criteria in a multicenter prospective study. Methods. Patients older than 50 years, presenting with new-onset bilateral shoulder pain with elevated acute-phase reactants (APR), were assessed for the fulfillment of the new and old classification/diagnostic criteria sets for PMR. At the end of the 1-year followup, 133 patients were diagnosed with PMR (expert opinion) and 142 with non-PMR conditions [69 rheumatoid arthritis (RA)]. Discriminating capacity, sensitivity, and specificity of the criteria sets were estimated. Results. Discriminating capacity of the new clinical criteria for PMR from non-PMR conditions and RA as estimated by area under the curve (AUC) were good with AUC of 0.736 and 0.781, respectively. The new criteria had a sensitivity of 89.5% and a specificity of 57.7% when tested against all non-PMR cases. When tested against all RA, seropositive RA, seronegative RA, and non-RA control patients, specificity changed to 66.7%, 100%, 20.7%, and 49.3%, respectively. Except for the Bird criteria, the 4 previous criteria had lower sensitivity and higher specificity (ranging from 83%-93%) compared with the new clinical criteria in discriminating PMR from all other controls. Conclusion. The new 2012 EULAR/ ACR clinical classification criteria for PMR is highly sensitive; however, its ability to discriminate PMR from other inflammatory/noninflammatory shoulder conditions, especially from seronegative RA, is not adequate. Imaging and other modifications such as cutoff values for APR might increase the specificity of the criteria.Öğe Quality of life, disease activity and preferences for administration routes in rheumatoid arthritis: a multicentre, prospective, observational study(Oxford Univ Press, 2022) Direskeneli, Haner; Karadag, Omer; Ates, Askin; Tufan, Abdurrahman; Inanc, Nevsun; Koca, Serdar S.; Cetin, Gozde Y.Objective We aimed to evaluate quality of life (QoL), disease activity, compliance to treatment, patient and physician preferences for route of administration (RoA), status of health and pain in RA patients starting advanced treatments or needing a switch, and the factors associated with patient preferences. Methods A multicentre, prospective, observational and 1-year follow-up study was conducted, between 2015 and 2020, in adult RA patients using advanced treatments for the first time or needing a switch in their current treatments. All the data collected were entered into electronic case report forms. DAS in 28 joints with ESR [DAS28-4(ESR)], EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D), HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology (CQR-19), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Instrument (WPAI) and Patient Global Assessment-Visual Analogue Scale (PGA-VAS) questionnaires were used for longitudinal assessments. Results Four hundred and fifty-nine patients were enrolled. Three hundred and eight patients (67.1%) attended the final study visit at 12 months and were included for comparative analyses. Irrespective of RoA, the disease activity and QoL improved significantly at 12 months, whereas compliance worsened. At baseline and 12 months, EQ-5D and DAS28-4(ESR) scores were significantly correlated (P < 0.001). The WPAI scores changed significantly in favour of better outcomes over 12 months after initiation of advanced treatment or switching (P < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients preferred an oral RoA, in comparison to physicians (53.6% vs 31.4%; P < 0.001). Patient and physician RoA preferences were independent of gender, age, disease duration, advanced treatment type and the EQ-5D-3L, DAS28-4(ESR), HAQ-DI, PGA-VAS and CQR-19 scores at baseline. Conclusion The oral route was more frequently preferred by patients compared with physicians, although patients' preference rates showed a slight increase towards the end of the treatment, which might be an important factor for RA outcomes. Better control of disease activity and QoL were achieved at 12 months, regardless of RoA. Lay Summary What does this mean for patients? People with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and their physicians can have different views throughout the patient journey, whether deciding the main treatment objective, switching a drug or deciding the route of drug administration. However, data are limited in this area. For this purpose, we have conducted a survey study to identify differences between the views of patients and physicians on the management of RA. In this study, we have shown that RA medication compliance decreases over time, irrespective of medication route. This is similar to other studies. We also spotted that there are different routes of drug adminstration (RoA) preferred: a higher proportion of patients preferred an oral RoA compared with physicians (53.6% vs 31.4%, respectively). Patient and physician RoA preferences were not related to gender, age, disease duration, treatment type and disease activity. By surveying patients and physicians at the same time, we have identified their differences better compared with previous studies. Patient preferences should have a major impact on disease management, and the results of this study might encourage patients to discuss their thoughts and preferences with their clinicians to achieve a better outcome.Öğe Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Systemic Sclerosis: Not Less Frequent Than Rheumatoid Arthritis and Not Detected With Cardiovascular Risk Indices(Wiley, 2016) Ozen, Gulsen; Inanc, Nevsun; Unal, Ali U.; Korkmaz, Fatmanur; Sunbul, Murat; Ozmen, Mustafa; Akar, ServetObjective. To determine the frequency of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma) compared to healthy subjects (HS) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to determine the ability of cardiovascular (CV) risk indices in detecting SSc patients with subclinical atherosclerosis. Methods. A total of 110 SSc patients (102 females and 8 males, mean +/- SD age 50.5 +/- 11.9 years), 110 age-and sex-matched RA patients, and 51 HS without CV disease were examined with ultrasonography (US). Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) >0.90 mm and/or carotid plaques were used as the gold standard for subclinical atherosclerosis (US+). Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), QRisk II, and 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) CV risk indices were calculated. Results. Twenty-one (19.1%) SSc patients, 24 (21.8%) RA patients, and 3 (5.9%) HS had subclinical atherosclerosis (SSc versus RA: P=0.62, SSc versus HS: P=0.029). cIMT in SSc was higher compared to HS (0.68 +/- 0.15 mm versus 0.61 +/- 0.10 mm; P=0.008) but similar to RA patients (0.66 +/- 0.14 mm; P=0.82). Subclinical atherosclerosis in SSc was associated with age (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, P=0.013), elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (OR 3.4, P=0.045), and pulmonary arterial hypertension (OR 4.27, P=0.012). Concerning CV risk indices, of the 21 US+ SSc patients only 0, 3 (14.2%), and 6 (28.6%) were classified as high CV risk according to SCORE, QRisk II, and ACC/AHA risk indices, respectively. Conclusion. Subclinical atherosclerosis in SSc patients is more frequent than in HS, but is as frequent as in RA patients in which accelerated atherosclerosis is clearly defined. CV risk indices for the general population are considerably insufficient to detect SSc patients with atherosclerosis.